Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voice of process

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Is this ... even English? It does not seem to be about singing.  Sandstein  20:54, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voice of process (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject does not seem to be notable per WP:GNG. The sources in the article do not suggest notability (reference #2 does not even mention the subject and reference #1 does not go into depth about the term). A WP:BEFORE search did not find any reliable sources using this term. -KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 18:00, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 18:23, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:31, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.