Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vlaakith
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Githyanki. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 05:50, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
- Vlaakith (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This doesn't establish notability. TTN (talk) 23:49, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 23:50, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
- Merge to Githyanki, perhaps. No secondary sources are cited, and the only decent third-party material I'm seeing is (funnily enough) some academic literature that mentions how surprisingly broad Wikipedia's coverage of D&D is. Josh Milburn (talk) 02:20, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
- Interesting... URL? Jclemens (talk) 19:37, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
- @Jclemens: There's this piece on Academia.edu by Scott Kildall and Nathaniel Stern. There's a published article that I can't access here. I suspect it's basically the same article. Josh Milburn (talk) 21:11, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
- Interesting... URL? Jclemens (talk) 19:37, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
- Keep or merge to Githyanki. BOZ (talk) 04:32, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
- Merge per the above. Jclemens (talk) 19:37, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.