Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Violent and Lazy (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 19:59, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Violent and Lazy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be quite notable enough to warrant its own article. Lachlan Foley (talk) 20:31, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep another nonsense nomination by Lachlan Foley, as this is a charting single and satisfies WP:NMUSIC.Dan arndt (talk) 23:28, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Where does it say one single, solitary chart placement is enough for a subject to have its own Wikipedia article? Should we create articles for absolutely every song that ever charted anywhere in the world? Lachlan Foley (talk) 01:38, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article contains numerous references supporting the song, apart from the fact it charted. Dan arndt (talk) 03:07, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NMUSIC states it, pretty explicitly: "The single or album has appeared on any country's national music chart." Do you mind me asking how it is you're nominating songs for deletion without being familiar with the notability guideline governing songs? And yes, NMUSIC as written means that folks can create articles for absolutely every song that ever charted anywhere in the world. If you've got a problem with that, you ought to take it to the NMUSIC talk page. Nha Trang ^Allons! 18:05, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: as a prima facie pass on NMUSIC. Nha Trang ^Allons! 18:05, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per previous AfD. No new reasons for deletion provided by this nominator.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 00:46, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, bad nomination - David Gerard (talk) 22:53, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as per all others and passing NMUSIC. Lachlan Foley, when you pull this stuff, you're not helping this project.--Oakshade (talk) 15:35, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.