Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vidhya Vinod (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:57, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vidhya Vinod

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A previous article about this person was created by a now-blocked WP:COI account and deleted in August 2020. The present article was created as a Draft by a new user, declined 3 times at AfC between January and June 2021, but has now been moved to mainspace by the article creator. (The Infobox photo can also be seen in this reference but has been uploaded to Commons as being from another account's "personal collection".) I can't see the previous article instance to compare it, but Timtrent's rationale on that AfD seems applicable to the present instance, as do the rationales in the AfC rejections, such as that appearing in a 100-richest-women-in-a-country list is not inherently notable here. Although receiving one of 5 New Indian Express "Verve" awards in 2019 is noted in the article, that does not appear inherently notable for WP:ANYBIO #1, and would have been open to consideration in the 2020 AfD. Clearly this is a person who has board roles in various companies but I am not seeing evidence that encyclopaedic notability is demonstrated. AllyD (talk) 09:55, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 09:55, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 09:55, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 09:55, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The business person fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG. Some of the refs are clearly promotional in nature. Venkat TL (talk) 10:19, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:01, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:01, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete G4 and Salt: WP:ROTM business person. I do not have admin goggles so cannot compare with the prior article that was deleted. Even so I see very similar rationale for deletion. Words such as "entrepreneur" do not need to be stated for real entrepreneurs. M<rketing categories like the 100 richest Foos in Bar are puffery and pointless. They indicate faux notability, gossip column trivia and hype. Vinod did stuff. Good. But it is not notable stuff, and she fails WP:BIO Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 16:52, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Opposing the Deletion The above-stated reasons are just baseless, she had made some remarkable achievements as a woman and that's the reason why the media covered the achievement widely. she is a widely notable person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.156.209.34 (talk) 11:27, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Remember declining it and having a discussion on it. Wasn't notable then, ain't notable now. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 02:20, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and SALT pretty clearly a PR piece and does not appear to be any more notable than she was when the previous version was deleted. Best, GPL93 (talk) 16:11, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.