Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vibration of rotating structures

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 17:05, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vibration of rotating structures

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I believe it to be a case of WP:A11, as Klaus Konig is both the original author of the article, and its sources, another user disagreed on this. Either way, I also think the article requires serious work on it if not deleted. Rody1990 (talk) 17:02, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Rody1990 (talk) 17:02, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The subject is notable and has certainly been the subject of many articles and books. However, the content of the article is pure original research, as the WP article and the two sources have the same author. Moreover none source is reliable, as one is a presentation at a forum, and the title of the other (in German) is not known by Google Scholar. Moreover, nothing in the article can be useful for making an article on this subject. This is clearly a case for WP:TNT. D.Lazard (talk) 17:59, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per D.Lazard. WP:BLOWITUP, since it's otherwise notable. —⁠烏⁠Γ ^(kaw) │ 22:31, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The first source is a report for the Verein Deutscher Ingenieure, so presumably of some technical reliability (albeit not available online - archive bottoms out in 2011 [1]). However, this is still far too much of an OR approach, and can't usefully form the basis of an encyclopedic article. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 00:47, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.