Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vertical auto profile

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Nominator has been blocked and never presented an argument outside 'this was generated by AI' when it certainly was not. (non-admin closure) Nathannah • 📮 16:34, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vertical auto profile

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see significant coverage,contains information from primary sources or AI (some artificial programming model) or or copyrighted Iban14mxl (talk) 04:48, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 April 26. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:59, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:07, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral comment Last edit to the article was in 2021, so it's highly doubtful an LLM generated any text here. Nathannah • 📮 00:12, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I have analyzed the article's text with several AI text detectors, and they all yield the same result: the text is human. The mention of "not having enough coverage" is also questionable (to put it mildly), and the user did not substantiate it. One last point is that the user requesting the block claims a copyright violation, but the analysis of the article shows no evidence of plagiarism. That said, although the article does need improvement—such as fixing the reference formatting—I believe it should remain on Wikipedia. CarlosEduardoPA (talk) 08:02, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Important: The user who opened the inquiry has been indefinitely blocked from the English Wikipedia. CarlosEduardoPA (talk) 01:33, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: To be more specific of what CarlosEduardoPA said, the nominator was blocked as a sock. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 07:54, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.