Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vehicular Basic Loads

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to The Morrow Project. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 15:25, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vehicular Basic Loads

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is about a product consisting of three fill-in-the-blank paper forms to create imaginary cargo manifests in imaginary military-type vehicles. Article has only one source. A basic BEFORE (JSTOR, newspapers.com, Google News, Google Books) fails to discover any additional RS and, even references in non-RS, are incidental mentions. Fails GNG. As a backup option to delete, redirect to The Morrow Project might be fine, though this is such a common term it seems it would be better to free this space for an article on a real world automotive topic. Article is receiving about one (1) view every 3-4 days so it's not like this is an in-demand search term. Chetsford (talk) 02:23, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Chetsford (talk) 02:28, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Chetsford (talk) 02:28, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Chetsford (talk) 02:28, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Chetsford (talk) 02:28, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep if more sources can be found, otherwise merge to The Morrow Project. BOZ (talk) 06:08, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per BOZ. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 06:03, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to The Morrow Project. Single source is a short capsule review (which from the TOC of The Spacegamer consists of 13 reviews in the space of 6 pages - this one listed towards the end as a playing aid the Morrow Project). Not discussed independently of the Morrow Project. This article is short, and the target of the merge is fairly short as well and could definitely list the various playing aids and expansions. There seems to be very little reason to create a spinoff for this particular playing aid. Icewhiz (talk) 06:33, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Based on reconsideration per Icewhiz' reasoning, I have no particular objection to a Merge. Chetsford (talk) 18:59, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 17:27, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 15:44, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per Icewhiz. SportingFlyer talk 22:40, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.