Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VCal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:46, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

VCal

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable Chidgk1 (talk) 08:35, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:42, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Searching for sources is complicated by the number of things out there called "vcal". My understanding is that vCal and VCalendar are different formats, although some folks abbreviate VCalendar as VCal. That said, I could not find any independent, in depth, reliable sources discussing this calendaring format. I don't see a compelling target for a redirect, either. Hence, delete. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 20:42, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:04, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete as I cannot find any reliable sources on "vcal" related to "Vision PIM". Can't even find unreliable sources. Article has been tagged for 15 years for not citing any sources and for 7 years for notability. AncientWalrus (talk) 17:45, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.