Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Useless Knowledge Magazine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Article's subject is found to lack notability. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 05:56, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Useless Knowledge Magazine

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable online magazine. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 15:17, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I reviewed this at NPP and there's simply nothing to suggest better for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 17:39, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 17:40, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 17:40, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete because only 1-2 sources on that page are even independent of the subject and in detail about the subject, and even then, not that much. Subject is not notable because of this. Tom29739 ^[talk] 23:40, 1 May 2016 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.