Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. April 1st has come and gone. (non-admin closure) --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 03:21, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Universe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous.
Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

Despite the numerous references included in the article, I am positively convinced that it is impossible to actually prove the existence of the universe. Therefore, I believe this article should be deleted immediately for not only being unsourced but also being really quite unnotable as the so-called "universe" is just a construct of our imaginations. See Plato's cave. FastLizard4 (talk•contribs) 07:27, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Hamster. Blodance the Seeker 08:10, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete obsolete, replaced by Omniverse. 65.93.12.101 (talk) 09:00, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Obsolete. There are now many kinds of verses, Biverse, Triverse, Quadverse, Omniverse etc. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 09:36, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't contain a single source that's independent of the subject.--Physics is all gnomes (talk) 12:03, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Jessica Alba is somewhere there, let me spend time with her first before destroying it! --TitanOne (talk) 13:31, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Split - While individual components are notable, no reliable sources are available to talk about the universe as a whole. Even leading scientists have argued to split the content so it can be discussed rationally. "Space" is big. Really big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mindbogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space[1] Hasteur (talk) 14:06, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It's already been split, and we have an article on it multiverse. 65.93.12.101 (talk) 14:31, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep via WP:IAR. It is pointless to delete, as someone will simply create a new one. Dennis Brown (talk) 15:53, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect—This is an obvious PoV fork of Multiverse.—RJH (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.