Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universal intellectual and spiritual guide

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 09:02, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Universal intellectual and spiritual guide

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PRODed by @Some Gadget Geek: and endorsed by me. Non-notable self-published book that appears to have been created by an account with some link to the author. Fails WP:NBOOK and WP:GNG TonyBallioni (talk) 03:57, 14 November 2016 (UTC)'[reply]

Delete. Per nom, spam book deprodded by SPA creator. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:16, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strongly suggest this article to stay. Per tsfromusa

The reasons are: 1. This book is new, but highly valuable to humanity. Most fellow humans have problem improve themselves intellectually and spiritually on their own because they are not conscious of The Human Intelligence System and the human intellectual process, "Complete and Successful Intellectual Process(CSIP)". The author is hoping humanity will bring "The Human Intelligence System" and "Complete and Successful Intellectual Process" to conscious level sooner than later. 2. Up to now, humanity is only semi-conscious of The Human Intelligence System and the human intellectual process, "Complete and Successful Intellectual Process". For examples, in Buddhism guide, Sandhinirmocana Sutra, the author described the 9th intellectual and spiritual stage is "liberating one's mind from (words) / (linguistic expressions)". On page 108 of The Power of Now, Eckhart Tolle asked his book readers to "look beyond the words". On the first page of How to win Friends & Influence People, Dale Carnegie provided a page of instructions to tell his reader to look beyond words . In section "Inside-Out" of The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People, Stephen R. Covey attempted to ask his reader to look beyond words. Of these famous authors and many more self-help book authors, they used "Complete and Successful Intellectual Process(CSIP)" unconsciously or semi-consciously. Hence, they know that to develop the intellectual capabilities they found valuable, a person needs to "look beyond words". However, none of the authors explained how to do it consciously. The capability to "look beyond words" to develop intellectual capability on one's own is to "CSIP at level of interconnectedness, mental object, and physicon", as explained in the book "Universal Intellectual and Spiritual Guide". To speed up the intellectual and spiritual advancement on individual level and humanity as a whole, The Human Intelligence System and "Complete and Successful Intellectual Process" to conscious level. "Universal Intellectual and Spiritual Guide" is created to accomplish this goal. Once a person masters CSIP, the person can consciously gain the full value of all books that is ever written. I sincerely ask you to let this article to stay.

Delete: A WP:SPA article on a book newly self-published through CreateSpace. There is no evidence of attained notability. (Responding to the Keep opinion above, in time this book may prove "highly valuable to humanity" but that is speculative prediction at this point.) AllyD (talk) 08:39, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Notabilty of book not established by secondary sources.Thoughtmonkey (talk) 11:07, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:13, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:13, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I can find nothing that would suggest that this book passes notability guidelines at this point in time and it's borderline promotional enough to speedy under that criteria. This book is pretty much a good example of why I wanted a speedy deletion guideline for books. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:27, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- is there such thing as "book spam"? If it were, this page would qualify :-) . K.e.coffman (talk) 08:21, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@K.e.coffman: You seem to be right - we have WP:G11 and if everyone agrees this page qualifies for it we might as well RfSD and SNOW this discussion. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 19:54, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh -- Thought Wikipedia would be something different than the commercialized aggregate place or a socially hyped compost, but a place where people would search, validate, and collect valuable and useful knowledge for betterment of humanity. Looks like Wikipedia editors are also just like a bunch blind men keeping themselves busy with an big elephant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.163.142.115 (talk) 21:35, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.