Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UniBall (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Uni-ball. Kurykh (talk) 01:21, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

UniBall

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be a notable video game; a search for references failed to find any significant reliable coverage. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 04:17, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 04:18, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and redirect. Looks non-notable to me. A redirect to Uni-ball would probably be useful here though. Raymie (t • c) 07:20, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The VG/RS search drags up 0 hits of worth. Fails the WP:GNG test -- Delete. Subsequently redirect per Raymie. --Izno (talk) 14:18, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect - As suggested by Raymie. Interestingly enough, though the article states "released in 1999. This game is one of longest running independant games on the internet.", all the sources I've found say that the game was released just a couple weeks ago. Incidentally, none of those sources have anything on the game beyond title/platform/release date, so no help there.--Martin IIIa (talk) 13:48, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.