Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultimet
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Haynes International. Courcelles 00:52, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Ultimet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No special reason for claiming notability identified. All references are the company's own. Fails notability guidelines. Reads like an advertisement. Velella Velella Talk 23:06, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge (with article Hastelloy as well) to Haynes International): search Google Books, and you will find many independent references, but nothing indicating independent notability. הסרפד (call me “Hasirpad”) (formerly R——bo) 01:03, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note that there are 337 results at Google Scholar, all of which seem to be about the subject. Hastelloy gets many more results, but Hastelloy is a series of alloys, while Ultimet is one alloy. הסרפד (call me “Hasirpad”) (formerly R——bo) 01:17, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. הסרפד (call me “Hasirpad”) (formerly R——bo) 01:20, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MJ94 (talk) 00:03, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 January 14. Snotbot t • c » 05:58, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Haynes International. I have merged Ultimet and Hastelloy in to Haynes International. Please consider merging WP:BEFORE nominating for deletion. -—Kvng 20:56, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.