Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultimate Enemy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep on the issue of keep/delete, no consensus on the issue of merging. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:37, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Ultimate Enemy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete. This limited series is the first part of a three-part trilogy that make up one continuous story. The entire trilogy already has its own article dealing with all three parts here. Friginator (talk) 17:44, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:02, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Ultimate Comics: Enemy Trilogy. Jimmy Pitt talk 20:04, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into Ultimate Comics: Enemy Trilogy like Ultimate Galactus Trilogy.Crazy runner (talk) 09:13, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Start with some merge banners. It strikes me as hostile bring this straight to WP:AFD. What's up with that? --Kvng (talk) 21:04, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep There is enough coverage of it at Comic Book Resources and elsewhere to count. I added into the article a quote from a reviewer at newsarama I found through Google news search. Dream Focus 22:05, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.