Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ubuntu Foundation (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A redirect to Canonical (company) may be created at editorial discretion. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:48, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ubuntu Foundation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication that this organization is anything other than dormant, as it has been since 2008. Nothing more than a commitment which was never brought to pass. No indication that it ever satisfied WP:NCORP or WP:GNG. Safiel (talk) 03:52, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm an Ubuntu Member and can confirm the Ubuntu Foundation is not a legally registered entity and does not exist at all and definitely is not governed by the Ubuntu Community Council or Technical Board as the article claims. Benjamin Kerensa 05:50, 5 September 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bkerensa (talk • contribs)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:31, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:31, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Canonical (company), or just delete, barring a sudden influx of RSes - David Gerard (talk) 11:51, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:28, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as this entity does not appear to exist. Redirect to Canonical (company) as a backup option, but Delete is preferred given the unclear status. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:38, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:38, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.