Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UML fever
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Delete. Already speedy deleted as a G3 Hoax. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 14:48, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- UML fever (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seems to be basically a hoax article, taking an expression from a couple of magazine article and blowing it up out of all proportion AndrewWTaylor (talk) 20:37, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Buzzword created by a single author/journalist/coder. Not an actual concept--Sodabottle (talk) 18:52, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete also looking at one of the sources significant amounts of copyright violation: I suspect given the writing style most or all of it needs excising leaving little or nothing behind, but deleting it deals with the copyvio too.--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 13:08, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.