Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UDTP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 18:55, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

UDTP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article about a new networking protocol. I am unable to find any reliable sources about the subject. Fails WP:GNG. - Mr X 00:55, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 23:16, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Other than some unfortunate spurious matches (such as UDTP=Unfair Deceptive Trade Practices), there's little out there. There are a few minor references to IPv17 (which is also up for deletion), but that's it. --Larry/Traveling_Man (talk) 00:02, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, @MrX: IIRC there is (or should be) a feature to bundle closely related AfDs into one AfD. –Be..anyone 💩 04:26, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Agree with above, not able to locate evidence of this suposed networking protocol at the Cisco site or industry sites or at government sites. Prhartcom (talk) 17:45, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per non. Non-notable protocol. Not an accepted standard. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:56, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.