Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Two Twenty Two

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:03, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Two Twenty Two

This unreferenced article makes statements that several google searches could not verify or even circumstantially support. I can't find any evidence that 222 is considered an unlucky number or that it has any relevance to cannabis culture, jamaican culture or anything at all. Forget that it's poorly written, forget that it is two separate articles conjoined, forget the lack of referencing and style issues. The big problem is that its core subject is false, or at least not verifiable. And therefore should be deleted. Carbon Rodney 10:29, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I guess in this Fiji mermaid the second half is the real article, the spam, about the Canadain (sic) Music Duo and the first part is a parody regarding 420 which means something in Cannabis culture although no one really knows how that got started because they were stoned at the time and it probably was just a joke to make somebody think it meant something when it really didn't anyhow. So the whole article is indeed WP:MADEUP. Drawn Some (talk) 10:50, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No Jamaicans were arrested for possessing a controlled substance before 1978? Seems too hoaxy for my liking. Everything else fails a quick googling. Cheers, This flag once was red^propaganda_deeds 14:35, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:BOLLOCKS. I am a licensed drug counselor and this one is news to me. A 222 is a Canadian aspirin-caffeine-codeine tablet. Eauhomme (talk) 06:03, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.