Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tuliram Ronghang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 15:36, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tuliram Ronghang

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A district level politician. The article fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 09:44, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 09:44, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 09:44, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. District level politicians are not notable. LefcentrerightTalk (plz ping) 10:37, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:GNG and WP:NPOL fail. Best, GPL93 (talk) 03:33, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No contest The page is of a district level politician of India, True. The person is also a member of council, True.

Jor langneh Talk 07:09, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. @Jor.langneh: do not use headers to mark your votes as it will break the coding of WP:XFDC. ミラ P 02:17, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, fails WP:GNG. Tayi Arajakate (talk) 11:13, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.