Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tschunk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Club-Mate. No objections to the merge which has already been carried out for over a week. ansh 666 08:06, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tschunk

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One of countless non-notable cocktails. Existence of recipes for it does not provide notability, nor does passing mention that it was consumed at an event. Reywas92^Talk 17:45, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 17:48, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ Merge Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG. I found only passing mentions in a small number of hacker-culture articles. It's a background, not a star. There's a 2011 book reference, but it too is a passing mention. Looks like the word itself may originate from James Joyce's Ulysses (here at Project Gutenberg): "True men. Lid Ker Cow De and Doll. Ay, ay. Like you men. Will lift your tschink with tschunk," in 1922. But that doesn't make the cocktail so named itself notable. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 19:26, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Passing mention does not signify notability. LK (talk) 10:48, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Club-Mate (oops, I did already). --KAMiKAZOW (talk) 12:05, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting per the merge that occurred while the article was being considered at AfD.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:14, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Club-Mate supported per my earlier !vote. Assuming that the merge sticks, just need to complete it and clean up. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 16:00, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.