Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trust-Hub (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 18:19, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Trust-Hub

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

2nd time at AFD, last time no one commented either way, so admin kept for some unknown reason. Several references that do everything except talk about the notability of this website. Searching for actual coverage of this website only brings up primary sources or passing mentions. Created by SPA, looks like an advert, which is an editing problem but still can't fix if you can't find coverage. Articles or publications that mention it are involved in it, no independent coverage. Dennis Brown (talk) 15:02, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:47, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: a website where members of the IC hardware security community can share their discoveries and other information that accelerates hardware security research and developments. No showing of long term historical notability. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:01, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ankit Maity ^TalkContribs 09:04, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability under our guidelines. (Why was this AFD relisted, when two editors proposed deletion and no one suggested a keep? It should have been closed as 'delete' first time around.) Robofish (talk) 14:31, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.