Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Triple C Web Application

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:16, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Triple C Web Application

Non notable HTML syntax (which judging from the article doesn't really appear to actually work anywhere) Jenuk1985 | Talk 02:05, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And given the glacial pace of browser adoption of new HTML features (and this is not even being considered by W3C) will probably never come to anything. Nice idea, no citations, no keep. Aymatth2 (talk) 02:28, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 03:27, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No sources, borderline incomprehensible article. (It "shortens the way of the HTML"?) Zetawoof_(ζ) 04:04, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Appears to be about software that, according to the article, has zero current users. No indication of notability. –Henning Makholm (talk) 04:10, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. Hoax and nonsense. And I'm not keen to visit their website. Has anybody tried? Looking at Google, the amount of words "hacked" and "warez" gives me that "stay away" message. For this reason, I'm removing the links from the article. I really don't trust them. Anyone who's visited and found it's kosher, feel free to reinstate. Greg Tyler ^{(t • c)} 11:53, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.