Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trinity (The Matrix)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. I'm closing as Speedy Keep per SK1 as 1. Nominator hasn't searched for anything and 2. AFD isn't a clean up solution! (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 00:12, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Trinity (The Matrix)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails WP:NOTPLOT. DJ Autagirl (talk) 21:08, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 September 7. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:33, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: A robust, good-faith nomination might have mentioned the possibility of a merge and redirest to List of minor characters in the Matrix series and that this was one of a series of related nominations. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:41, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - the list of minor characters is already WP:TOOLONG. Merging this entire series of AfDs into the list would make it way too WP:TOOBIG. VMS Mosaic (talk) 01:46, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - There is no evidence that the nominator has tried any alternatives to deletion, such as looking at the literature to see if Trinity is notable. A google scholar search for Trinity "The Matrix" film gives 5820 results. AFD should not be used for cleanup, and AFDing all the characters in one go means that it would be difficult for anyone to fix the articles in the time given. 110.20.234.69 (talk) 03:23, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:47, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:47, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:47, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep there is lots of content in google about this topic. Stuartyeates (talk) 04:46, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.