Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trinder reaction

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep as moot. The current, wholly rewritten article bears such a scant resemblance to the nominated article that this discussion seems beside the point. Kudos to Uncle G for the save. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:57, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Trinder reaction

Delete unref'd one liner about a chemical reaction without an indication of why it's notable. There are literally billions of chemical reactions, like mathematical equations, and they are not inherently notable, even if they can be verified. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:52, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a quick Google search does not reveal any particular importance or in-depth coverage of this reaction. Drawn Some (talk) 18:20, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- A slow, and more thorough, Google search would have been better. Uncle G (talk) 01:41, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 18:32, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 10:51, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, notable reaction in the field of laboratory medicine. Multiple articles on PubMed. Uncle G (talk · contribs) has rescued this article, I would suggest withdrawal of this AfD. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 10:51, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.