Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transparent LED-embedded glass

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Der yck C. 12:44, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Transparent LED-embedded glass

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sounds more like a advertise for a product made by a single company than a technology Craesh (talk) 00:42, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article is expressly not about a single company product, and that would not in itself exclude it from Wikipedia (if it did, many patent protected products would be out). A google search shows that glass with LEDs embedded is widely used for a variety of purposes and available from many sources. --AJHingston (talk) 11:19, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:15, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:17, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I read the whole article and looked at all of the on-line references. The title and the particulars seem to be about one company's products. There is no real overview information as there should/would be if were a general topic/technology. The on-line sources were generally about the one company's product, plus a bunch of patent search results which seem more like incoherent filler rather than supporting text. If this a real field (by this name) rather than one company's product, it sure isn't covered in this article. North8000 (talk) 02:43, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 02:33, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per AJHingston. But shouldn't it be renamed to LED-embedded glass? "Transparent" is obviously redundant. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 16:59, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.