Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Train Benching
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 01:23, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Train Benching (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable term with a low number of hits. Might by better off in the dictionary. Night of the Big Wind talk 21:28, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - smells WP:MADEUP to me; WP:NEO at best. - The Bushranger One ping only 01:48, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: how is this allowed to be here? Till I Go Home (talk) 07:49, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- Even if it is a genuine term, it should be in a dictionary, not here. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:54, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This is a dictionary definition but I can't find any evidence that it would meet Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion, so a transwiki would be pointless. Thryduulf (talk) 19:33, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.