Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tormenta
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Fram (talk) 14:23, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Tormenta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable RPG Blowdart | talk 16:18, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete-fails WP:N and has no references to reliable sources to verify it's existence.--SRX 16:26, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep - I can confirm its existence via a quick google, and it seems to have been around for a while. Being handicapped by an inability to speak Portugese, I can't find references or sources for it. I note that there is an article for it on the Portugese version of Wikipedia. RayAYang (talk) 17:25, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Bundle and Renom I just spoke with the author on his talk page. I think the rpg articles should be bundled and renommed. Currently the nom is running into issues with WP:JNN, and due to the motivations for deletion: WP:WAX and WP:ALLORNOTHING . HatlessAtless (talk) 17:42, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:35, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: I can't speak Portugese either, but this game has over three hundred thousand hits on the Brazilian Google [1], and that's pretty colossal; I note that the article on the Portugese Wikipedia has spawned enough attention to require its own navigation box. Has the nom researched any of these mass RPG AfDs, and what is the basis for the assertion that they are non-notable? RGTraynor 23:34, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep based on RGTraynor's research. Edward321 (talk) 01:20, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.