Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toon Zone (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:48, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Toon Zone

Tagged for notability since September, and for references since August 2006. Nothing but arguing and accusations of vandalism on the talk page. But regardless of the fact that nobody wants to improve this article, I'm seeing absolutely nothing in the way of notability per WP:WEB, just a bunch of fancruft. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 15:25, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unencyclopedic article with no real purpose other then to satisfy itself WP:FANCRUFT--Pmedema (talk) 16:24, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non notable, quite spam-ish, reads like a PR, talk page full of very verbose nonsense. Niczar ⏎ 19:26, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Any references in "popular culture" are too questionable. This article sounds like a self-promotion. Zero Kitsune (talk) 04:04, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom NN Dreamspy (talk) 20:09, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:47, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:47, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A 3+ year old article with no independent reliable sources. Artene50 (talk) 04:31, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.