Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Bonello

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Editorial cleanup is an issue for standard editing rather than outright deletion. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:32, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Bonello

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Someone else tried to afd this but didn't finish the process, leaving me to do all the work because NOBODY ELSE EVER NOTICES REDLINKED AFDs. Anyway, fails general notability, no significant secondary sources, horribly written. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 19:32, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Google throws up a few thousand results, some of which back up the claim of him winning the "King of the Cage" competition. That said, the article does need a lot of work, but that's what maintenance tags are for. BlazerKnight (talk) 22:44, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Is messy, but seems notable. JRA_Westy Qld2 ^Talk 12:18, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete without prejudice to recreation The burden on those who want to keep it is to fix it. This article in the current state is not work keeping. If I need to revisit this claim because someone has taken the effort to fix this article, I welcome a note on my talk page. Miami33139 (talk) 18:51, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:05, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep deleted 99% of the article (copyvio of http://thegunfightclub.com/about/) and added an infobox. He is completely notable (is featured on an MTV series, and is a professional martial artist). TheWeakWilled (T * G) 21:29, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.