Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomb Raider level editor
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. seresin ( ¡? ) 05:35, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Tomb Raider level editor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This article was deleted on September 14, 2007 and it was recreated on October 27 2007. It was already deleted two times. here and Here. According to both the article. It says it fails WP:NOTABLE,WP:RS and WP:V. As a nominator i vote the same. Google show only few results. It does not warrant the article. Also this article is to be salted has it should not be recreated again. SkyWalker (talk) 06:32, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge: into Tomb Raider (series), which already has a stub section for the Level Editor. ~~ [Jam][talk] 06:58, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:22, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Tomb Raider (series), some info will fit in well. STORMTRACKER 94 Go Irish! 14:32, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 14:40, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for preference, or merge without most of the exlinks if absolutely necessary. Percy Snoodle (talk) 15:07, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 16:14, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Because there's nothing to merge. User:Krator (t c) 22:53, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per my reasoning in the second nomination.--WaltCip (talk) 01:59, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - WP:SALT if necessary. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 00:20, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.