Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiptree Residents Association

Tiptree Residents Association

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I see no evidence that this organizations meets WP:NCORP, which is the applicable threshold for organizations. The coverage is fleeting and hyper-local. We don't even have an article for the council on which the only successful candidates from this group served. The only source currently in the article is from a different political party, and offers nothing more than a passing mention. Vanamonde93 (talk) 18:16, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Politics. Vanamonde93 (talk) 18:16, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:24, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:55, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I found no significant coverage. SL93 (talk) 23:17, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: How and why was this page made? Notablen't. Moritoriko (talk) 06:18, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is one of the least notable pages I have seen. There are no RSes and if every single group/association ever was given its own page, it would cause a page glut. If we can find more sources for it, that is a different story but for now, this is not worth keeping. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 15:21, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No significant coverage. Frank Ken (talk) 09:14, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - they basically did one thing 43 years ago. Bearian (talk) 21:25, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]