Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TikTok (3rd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Service not available:‎ This XFD close is not available in your region. (non-admin closure) Aasim (話すはなす) 02:19, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nein!
TikTok (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

"Scheiße" — Amerikanische TikTok-Nutzer.[April Fools!] AlphaBeta135  talk 00:00, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ban it forever, don't let users migrate it to RedNote. 2600:1700:78EA:450:60D1:C49:6E4E:86C9 (talk) 03:25, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to RedNote, as that was what the wider public seemingly did when TikTok was banned back in January User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 03:34, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Youtube Shorts Gonna eatpizza (talk) 20:56, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ban why did it get so? - ParticularEvent318 home (speak!). 21:41, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Gen Z must touch this. ѕιη¢єяєℓу ƒяσм, ᗰOᗪ ᑕᖇEᗩTOᖇ 🏡 🗨 📝 00:07, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.