Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tigerhawk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to List of Beast Wars characters. Mandsford 02:25, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tigerhawk

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed prod. Real world notability not clear, no reliable sources cited. J Milburn (talk) 20:34, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment- I guess this can't be more notable than Airazor. NotARealWord (talk) 21:08, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with List of Beast Wars characters. NotARealWord (talk) 21:15, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or merge with Beast Wars characters page if not. Mathewignash (talk) 22:12, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:42, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to List of Beast Wars characters. Character had a significant role during the season season. —Farix (t | c) 23:14, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- When dealing with non-notable character articles, it is always preferable to look for a list or to create one to merge the article into, or merge/redirect them to the main article instead of outright deletion and is in keeping with the WP:PRESERVE policy. Only in cases where the character is completely incidental should it be deleted. —Farix (t | c) 18:07, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No real-world notability asserted for a fictional character. Tarc (talk) 02:07, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fansites like retrojunk aren't reliable sources of information. see [1] Dwanyewest (talk) 22:15, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.