Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tianna Moore

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A redirect can be created if necessary. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:09, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tianna Moore

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This character does not assert notability and the main article already covers it. TTN (talk) 21:40, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- TTN (talk) 21:41, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - AfD should not be used to enforce redirects.[1] - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 21:43, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't being used to enforce redirects. The user disagreed with redirecting them the first time, so I placed one of the other characters up, and it was deleted. It seemed reasonable to assume that the user would then allow them to be redirected, but that isn't the case. Now this one is up for deletion as well, as it seems unlikely that discussion with a fan would produce any sort of results. TTN (talk) 21:51, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Daughters of the Moon. No evidence of independent notability. No references to third-party sources. --EEMIV (talk) 01:24, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect. I havent seen sources to make it a notable article by itself. RobJ1981 (talk) 12:02, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:30, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect as above. B.Rossow ^talk_contr 18:07, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and protected redirect as above. No real world significance here. Eusebeus (talk) 15:05, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No coverage to indicate notability. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 22:59, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect in agreement with many of the editors commenting here. Makes good sense. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 18:40, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per others. Rray (talk) 23:41, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per everyone else. (METOO) JBsupreme (talk) 05:58, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.