Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thornson Inertial Engine
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Pseudoscience would need more than 391 google hits to be notable for the pseudoscience, as it doens't appear o be real science.Blnguyen | rant-line 06:34, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That this device violates some basic laws of physics would not be a deletion reason in itself, but it is also completely non-notable. If someone can find s sort-of reliable source, a very small mentioning in Reactionless drive may be in place. --Pjacobi 21:06, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, google shows 391 hits. I think that is enough people that need to learn the law of conservation of momentum to justify keeping this article and, of course the category pseudophysics. pstudier 21:49, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, if the claim on the page is true and the IECEC actually studied the concept, it has some sort of inherent nobility. hateless 22:55, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I find it difficult enough to accept pseudoscience as notable, but c'mon, this concept is on the fringes even in the world of pseudoscience. Cold fusion would blow this pansy's little 391 Google hits out of the water. dryguy 00:04, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. "391" is notable? LOL. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 02:17, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per the above. Wikipedia is not a blog for every perpetual motion mechanic. Byrgenwulf 08:52, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nominator and previous deletion recommendations. The fringes of pseudoscience are a dark and mysterious land, far removed from Encyclopedia. Anville 19:13, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.