Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Dayspring
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:10, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Thomas Dayspring (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A perfectly respectable Clinical Assistant Professor with a long career who doesn't meet WP:NPROF or WP:GNG. Scopus shows 29 publication with an H-index of 13, which is modest for the field. Klbrain (talk) 10:30, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. hroest 15:59, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Medicine and New Jersey. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 16:41, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.