Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thirdie.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 03:53, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thirdie.com

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This website does not yet meet WP:WEB, Alexa lists it as the being the three million most visited website and the other references are not enough to provide notability being a local paper and a school newspaper. Smartse (talk) 20:34, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't think the Alexa rank is at all important, but I agree that it doesn't meet WP:WEB...it doesn't even seem to come close. I find only a single hit in google news: [1], and the overall web presence is minimal. Personally it looks like a cool idea...but nowhere near being notable yet. Cazort (talk) 20:55, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I almost tagged this for speedy deletion when I saw it come up, but decided against it because I thought at least a theoretical case could be made for its notability. Then I forgot about it, but I'm glad to see it come up on AfD, because I really couldn't find much of anything beyond blog references, tweets, and so on. Also, I remember this was mentioned in the AfD of Pete Merrill, the site's young creator, who was also deleted. Anyway, this website does not seem to meet notability standards. --Glenfarclas (talk) 21:24, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Comet Tuttle (talk) 21:36, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this website. Joe Chill (talk) 21:46, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - lack of independent reliable sources sufficient to establish notability. MikeWazowski (talk) 04:14, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a teenagers bedroom project. so what. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.