Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Third Best
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. BJTalk 02:39, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Third Best (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No evidence that this is a notable blog. A search is problematic because it returns a lot of things that The Age refers to as "Third Best" of something but I've been unable to find any evidence of notability. It's an Age-hosted blog but the blog doesn't inherit notability from its host. I don't believe a merge is appropriate since The Age doesn't cover its blogs and I think covering this would lead to undue featuring of this blog. TravellingCari 16:50, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- TravellingCari 16:52, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- TravellingCari 16:52, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note in the event this is deleted, Third best blog is re-direct to the article. TravellingCari 16:55, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails Wikipedia:Notability (web). WWGB (talk) 23:02, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete definitely non-notable--Lester 01:50, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, notability. QuidProQuo23 03:36, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.