Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Think of Me First as a Person
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. — CharlotteWebb 03:37, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged as A7, but contested. Some evidence of external coverage, but not a major film at all. Guy (Help!) 20:16, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It is included in the National Film Registry. That seems enough to me. --Wildnox(talk) 20:24, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, Wildnox's argument is the same as what I would have said. User:Zoe|(talk) 23:21, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep article establishes notability. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 23:24, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Hi, article's author here. Rather than making the case anew, let quote part of something I wrote in the article's talk section about the film earlier today: While there is no set of notability guidelines specific to motion pictures, I believe that Think of Me First as a Person is notable if we use a criterion similar to those already established to judge the notability of other media. A book meets the notability criteria if it "has won a non-trivial literary award"; a video game does if it "has won an award from a notable award-giving body independent of the game creators, sponsors, and publishers."; a song is notable if "[h]as won a major award," and so on. Likewise, as the film has been inducted into the United States National Film Registry -- a non-trivial honor presented to twenty-five "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant films" per year since 1988, 450 films so far in total -- I argue this reasonably establishes the film's notability. Epicharmus 23:36, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Article establishes notability. Films considered important enough to be conserved by the NFR (or any other national film registry) are notable. --Charlene 23:42, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, anyone who would tag this as A7 doesn't know what notable means. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 01:33, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep inclusion in the National Film Registry is enough for notability.-- danntm T C 02:29, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Film registry makes it permanently notable. Moscatanix 21:05, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Per above, to be included in the National Film Registry is a great honor for a film, especially considering the number that gets added. It would be quite sad if we measured films by box office takings or sales alone. --Nuclear
Zer021:08, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply] - Keep It would be downright silly for us not to have articles on National Film Registry movies. If that isn't a claim to notability, nothing is. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:40, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.