Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The joe mangle angle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 06:24, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The joe mangle angle

Article about a neologism which someone made up one day. PROD removed by the author who has gone to the trouble of setting up a special website on a free web-hosting service and adding a link to it. Sorry, Dave, that is not enough - see WP:NEO#Reliable sources for neologisms. An article would need to show reliable secondary sources which are independent of the subject. Delete as not notable. JohnCD (talk) 11:09, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The nom covers everything, and I confirm that what it says is accurate. Johnuniq (talk) 11:19, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This term is useful but WP:NEO and WP:MADEUP and WP:ISNOTURBANDICTIONARY. Drawn Some (talk) 11:55, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete In all liklihood made up, no reason to keep.Paste _{Let’s have a chat.} 12:13, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Looks to me like complete original research, even if it's not WP:MADEUP. The article's only author is named 'Therealbigdave', implying that he has a connection with the owner and 'founder' of the Joe Mangle Angle. JulieSpaulding (talk) 12:50, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not likely to catch on, but what a fascinating story. Fiona & David were in the petrol station and a man looked at them whilst blowing air into his tyres. Yep, Fiona 'n me was at the gas station and we seen this guy gettin' his tires filled, an' Fiona says to me, she says, "Dave, ain't that Trent Dawson?" Mandsford (talk) 12:54, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lolfail. This is the sort of article that really should have been deleted as a prod :/ Cheers. I'^mperator 14:22, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I think its relative to the heat of something, I forget how it goes. JBsupreme (talk) 15:02, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A quick Google search shows no relevant hits besides the wikipedia page, so I can't imagine it is in the any least bit notable. I do think its a funny story though. MATThematical (talk) 03:50, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.