Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Question Concerning Technology
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Michig (talk) 06:23, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The Question Concerning Technology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lengthy personal essay analyzing a work by Heidegger using the Heidegger work as the primary source, per WP:OR and WP:NOTESSAY. LuckyLouie (talk) 02:18, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. czar · · 02:34, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. czar · · 02:35, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep subject to normal editing improvement, given the importance of the Heidegger text of this English title. (Scholar link). AllyD (talk) 06:47, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per AllyD: remove the unsourced personal speculation, keep the article. —Tom Morris (talk) 08:43, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: The work itself deserves better treatment on the wiki; the article is admittedly a mess. --Pusillanimous (talk•contribs) 02:57, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.