Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The LoLo Project

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 02:15, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The LoLo Project

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable academic venture, no WP:RS on a cursory search. Perhaps notable if successful but not at this time Zeus^u|c 09:19, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The only page I could find was a Facebook fan page. Support deletion per the opening users statement. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 09:24, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Proposed for deletion by me under the alternate title The `Lo`Lo Project (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), created by User:Theloloproject. Delete, perhaps speedily as self-promotion. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 12:35, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It probably could be speedyable as promotional. In any case, it's definitely not notable at this point in time. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 00:29, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:10, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:10, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:10, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.