Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TheToolX

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:13, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

TheToolX

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources, fails WP:GNG. haj • talk 11:06, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Websites. haj • talk 11:06, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
can u please let me know the reason for deleting this page. Helio112 (talk) 11:11, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: sources seem to be largely self published, UGC or press releases. Article reads as promotional and there isn't any claim to notability. -- D'n'B-📞 -- 11:57, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per DandelionAndBurdock's assessment; article is promotional and subject fails GNG. MidnightMayhem 12:25, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:54, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This was just published 17 minutes ago -theinscribermag.com/how-thetoolx-com-became-a-viral-platform-for-online-tools-everyone-can-use/, unsigned/staff writer and reads like a promo regardless and it's blocked by the spam filter here. I don't see any coverage we can use to show notability. Oaktree b (talk) 15:54, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:GNG and promotional. Madeleine (talk) 17:03, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Zero reliable third-party sources. I became aware of this AfD because of the blacklist hits; relying heavily on blacklisted PR sites is usually a strong sign that a topic is not notable.OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:59, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No WP:RS Schützenpanzer (Talk) 13:52, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.