Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tetris Elements
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Merge to List of Tetris variants. PhilKnight (talk) 11:34, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Tetris Elements (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable; either delete or merge with List of Tetris variants - does not warrant its own article ≈ The Haunted Angel 01:42, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:N, no sources. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 02:03, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or merge; insufficiently notable variant. JJL (talk) 02:45, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - or redirect because List of Tetris variants does exsist --T-rex 15:51, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete There is a review available here and a short piece about it here, the second piece is not in-depth and at least one more full-sized review is needed to establish notability (read: actually have something to write with). Having no luck finding additional sources. Someoneanother 23:39, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. Someoneanother 01:46, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete - To add, I could only find a technical summary here, after some heavy searching. Not sure if this is enough to build an article from.Gazimoff WriteRead 14:45, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to list of Tetris variants. This is not much different than all the other Tetris and hence doesn't need its own article. MuZemike (talk) 19:02, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to list of Tetris variants. Not notable enough to justify its own page. -Rushyo (talk) 15:29, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to list of Tetris variants. Not notable enough to have its own page.Yobmod (talk) 11:15, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.