Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technosys

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge/redirect. I've done the redirect, any content worth merging can be pulled from the page history. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:22, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Technosys

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was proposed for deletion a year ago, and in deference to the ensuing discussion on User_talk:Ausgangskontrolle, I left it until now; however, I believe the original concern still exists; there is no evidence of significant coverage in independent reliable sources (WP:GNG), and the company does not seem to meet the requirements in WP:CORP. Chzz ► 11:31, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:39, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination, or redirect to Aamber Pegasus. This was a very early maker of a line of personal computers in the early 1980s. According to the Pegasus article they sold less than a hundred of them. That doesn't mean that the business or its product lacked significance: but if this business had any historical or technical significance, I would not expect Google Books and Scholar to draw a complete blank on it. All hits seem to be misfires. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:39, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Aamber Pegasus. Insufficiently notable on its own. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 18:58, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I hate to see such articles deleted, but it looks like no suitable sources exist. I think a merge is an appropriate solution, as this will leave the article content in the history should some source later come to light. If the article is deleted, I will be happy to provide the contents of the article on request to anyone who might be interested in finding an alternative host for the information.-gadfium 21:10, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Aamber Pegasus. Kind of interesting that there's sources for that article but they failed to mention the manufacturer! --Icerat (talk) 06:25, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Baseball Watcher 00:09, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.