Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tech News 2Night

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Tech News Today#History. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 11:03, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News 2Night

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Canceled podcast of no importance or merit; not noteworthy. Testspure (talk) 19:19, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:27, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The refs are primary or trivial mentions. Google news isn't returning anything. Szzuk (talk) 17:41, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. Subject lacks verifiable notability. -The Gnome (talk) 21:53, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I recommend redirect to Tech News Today, which is the podcast this was merged into. The article for Tech News Today also mentions Tech News 2Night. Mz7 (talk) 05:59, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Tech News Today or TWiT.tv. I would support a merge but the content is not verifiable, as said by Gnome. ––Redditaddict69 ^(talk) ^(contribs) 06:04, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – Both WP:ATD and WP:CHEAP do favor redirects over deletion. ––Redditaddict69 ^(talk) ^(contribs) 06:05, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
A straight Redirect would be an acceptable alternative to Deleting.

Note that the WP:CHEAP essay does not "favor redirects over deletion (to quote: Creating redirects from existing articles can be valid alternatives to pursuing deletion discussions, saving discussion time where a redirect is a legitimate and likely outcome. Consensus should still be sought via discussion), nor does the WP:ATD policy (to quote WP:ATD-R: Sometimes an unsuitable article may have a title that would make a useful redirect. In these cases, deletion is not required). Emphasis added. -The Gnome (talk) 08:05, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.