Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Team6 Game Studios
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 18:34, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Team6 Game Studios (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable company that has not been the subject of sustained independent coverage in multiple sources of the company itself, Team6 Game Studios. There are a spate of press releases out there. Some of the company's products have had short reviews published, and one game, FlatOut 3: Chaos & Destruction, might be notable, but the company itself is run-of-the-mill and has not received coverage for any innovative, influential, or otherwise significant accomplishments, other than continuing to exist in business. Dennis Bratland (talk) 15:00, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 15:46, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:46, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:47, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG. Searching with Google, I found nothing useful. I agree with nom: The subject appears to be completely run-of-the-mill and non-notable. Msnicki (talk) 15:57, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Same results as Msnicki with multiple searches. Seems like an advertisement. Mdechris (talk) 16:42, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.