Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tauranga Blogosphere

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#A7. Bbb23 (talk) 19:42, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tauranga Blogosphere

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No clear notability established. smileguy91^talk 03:19, 17 November 2013 (UTC) Please define 'No clear notability esyablished'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lofangas (talk • contribs) 04:26, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per A7. Cannot see how this remotely passes WP:GNG, WP:NWEB, and more specifically WP:WEBCRIT. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:25, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:52, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:52, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:53, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I agree, there isn't even that much basic information so I'll go ahead and tag it as A7. Even some preliminary searches didn't provide anything (unless it's a system bias issue). Though if it's a "series of blogs", it's probably not notable at all. SwisterTwister talk 19:00, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.