Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tathva

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 14:11, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tathva

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionable notability, advertisement. MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 14:13, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:26, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:28, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have found that this nominator has AfDed 9 Articles, 7 PRODs and 6 CSDs. of articles in a particular Category:Technical festivals in India I strongly believe WP:BEFORE was not done despite being clearly advised to so on Helpdesk.--DBig Xrayᗙ 12:16, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
DBigXray, I have decided to keep this AfD. This article appears fairly normal in the lede, albeit with questionable notability, but the further down you scroll the more promotional it becomes. First off, the very next thing in the article is a very large list of events, sorted by category. This isn't too bad until you reach the Wheels section, at which advertising language appears, with language like most exclusive line up and adventurous and thrilling. Under General, it reads more like it's giving taglines for events instead of short descriptions, and under Blitzkrieg it is just pure advertising for every game listed.

All coverage of the event appears to just be routine coverage from exactly 1 source, with insignificant content. MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 21:20, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 08:03, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 14:21, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep this article meets WP:GNG. Rocky 734 (talk) 08:35, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-encyclopedic ; no notability except in very lcoal publications. DGG ( talk ) 10:09, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I am inclined to go towards delete and have it mentioned in the college page as a passing by. I am not in favor of college fests being pushed as standalone articles unless it is a very big event to pass notability. There are 47+ reputed govt colleges (IITs and NITs) in India and many private colleges also which has these fests and of the same magnitude. If we remove the adverts and promotional content, there won't be much to keep anything. This can easily be accommodated in the parent article and a small paragraph highlighting the important points. Lakun.patra (talk) 13:35, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There is no significance except very local publications, fail WP:GNG.-Nahal^(T) 18:56, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.