Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tathastu Information Technology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. No prejudice against the creation of a redirect. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:08, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tathastu Information Technology

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

15 employees and really not reference given on notibality of the companyShrikanthv (talk) 08:58, 24 March 2014 (UTC) Shrikanthv (talk) 08:58, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:15, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:16, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → Call me Hahc21 06:14, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I can find company listings and a brief press mention of the company name in the context of a list of its managing director's interests but nothing beyond that. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 07:01, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:INDAFD. Notable in context to India.117.194.202.77 (talk) 17:03, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: WP:INDAFD is not a waiver of the need to demonstrate notability. It does describe some particular circumstances at WP:INDAFDKI but none concerns companies. What aspect do you think applies for this particular firm? AllyD (talk) 13:48, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This farm have been involved in several Govt. of India projects. Google does not indexed those links. Please, use this link [1]. 117.194.204.248 (talk) 07:44, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I previously looked at these links on that page. Which do you think is evidence of notability? Please note that being involved in projects is not inherently of encyclopaedic notability - it is what any and every company does. AllyD (talk) 18:55, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:13, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect/Merge to its CEO Anand Mishra as there are some local newspapers coverage. Bisswajit 07:02, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No attempt to provide evidence of notability. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:27, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.